Famous Authors And Their Typewriters

Found here. The article starts with,

There’s something magical about catching a glimpse of one of your favorite authors at work – even a photo of the epic event can send an anxious thrill down your spine, as if you might be able to see some hint of literary genius in posture or setting, in attire or facial expression. And it’s even better if they’re working on a typewriter. After all, there’s something impossibly gorgeous about a typewriter – maybe it’s the vintage charm, maybe it’s the physicality the noisy machine lends to the writing process, but people (and you can count us among them) go mad for typewriters, especially if they’ve been used by someone famous. Inspired by LIFE’s “In Praise of the Typewriter” photo gallery, we decided to compile all our favorite authors-at-work-on-typewriters photographs for your viewing pleasure, so click through to indulge in a little vintage literary eye candy.

No thanks. Nostalgia is nice (occasionally), but I’m not going back—I’m quite happy with my MacBook Pro. And number 7 was not an author!

Copyright secured by Digiprove © 2011 James Ament

The Picture of Dorian Gray

The Washington Post has a piece titled Nicholas Frankel reframes ‘Picture of Gorian Gray,’ which deals with the “uncensored” version versus the originally published 1891 version.

Wilde’s only novel raises several seriously troubling questions: If one could live a life of absolute freedom, would the result be happiness or a nightmare? How much of our complex selves do we deny or sacrifice to conventional morality? What, most simply, is this book really about?

To Nicholas Frankel, editor of “The Picture of Dorian Gray: An Annotated, Uncensored Edition,” the novel is a lightly coded text about homoeroticism, what  Lord Alfred Douglas, Wilde’s lover, famously dubbed “the love that dare not speak its name.” The centrality of the sexual is, Frankel maintains, much clearer in the original typescript, which forms the basis for this edition.

 

Copyright secured by Digiprove © 2011 James Ament

Ike’s Warnings

President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s farewell address famously warned the citizenry of the “military-industrial complex.” Wilson Quarterly has an article regarding his other warning during that speech relating to science. Quoting Ike:

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity…. The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present—and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.

The article has a few things to say in support of this and closes with:

Ike isn’t often credited as one of our more thoughtful presidents, but it’s clear he had some wisdom to offer on the question of science. In his memoirs, he approvingly cites a letter he received from James Conant, the former president of Harvard—and a chemist by training—after the shock of Sputnik in 1957. Conant wrote: “Those now in college will before long be living in the age of intercontinental ballistic missiles. What will be then needed is not more engineers and scientists, but a people who will not panic and political leaders of wisdom, courage, and devotion… not more Einsteins but more Washingtons and Madisons.”

I’m not so sure that we need fewer engineers and scientists, but I do think better leaders with Madisonian genes would help. What we actually got since Eisenhower’s time was more lawyers.

 

Copyright secured by Digiprove © 2011 James Ament