“Why don’t we love our intellectuals?”

Glenn Reynolds phrased it this way: “Questions Nobody is asking—except the Guardian.” He then says: “Perhaps these recent items from Christopher Hitchens and James Taranto might answer that question.”

I don’t know that Hitchens and Taranto answered the question, but Hitchens’ takedown of Noam Chomsky is fun to read. (Some of the commenters disagree.) Also, it seems to me that, in general, intellectuals are quite sensitive about not being at the center of all things important. Or worse, being ignored completely. I don’t think that’s necessarily anti-intellectualism. Rather, if they have nothing to offer except nonsense, then their irrelevance is deserved.

Copyright secured by Digiprove © 2011 James Ament

Great Philosophers Who Failed at Love

From Literary Kicks, the introduction:

There’s nothing wrong with the sideways-glance approach to the philosophical canon. Andrew Shaffer’s Great Philosophers Who Failed at Love is a slim, friendly book that asks a pertinent question: if folks like Saint Thomas Aquinas, Simone de Beauvoir, John Calvin, David Hume, Immanuel Kant, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Emanuel Swedenborg were so smart, how did they manage to meet life’s most personal challenge? Were they able to find true love, and if so were they able to sustain happy long-term relationships? What can we learn from the choices or mistakes they made?

Interesting comments, also.

Copyright secured by Digiprove © 2011 James Ament