From the Huff Post Blog—I like both, but I never found literary fiction “an emotional journey through the symphony of words, leading to a stronger grasp of the universe and of ourselves.” I found good writing and good story telling, just like quality genre fiction. The explanation as quoted sounds pretentious to me—somebody searching for a distinction in the reality of little difference.
The argument continues—so it goes.
From Commentary, a controversial piece by D. G. Myers (meaning that it’s sure to piss off some of the literary types). His two main points:
1. The term literary fiction was popularized by the New York Times book critic Michiko Kakutani, and it has become standard usage for distinguishing fiction of deep and earnest intent from bestsellers and “genre fiction.”
The distinction is bunk…
2. Literary fiction — or what the British novelist Linda Grant has taken to calling LitFic — ought to be a haughty way of saying “good fiction.” But that’s not how the term is used. What, then, is it? Easy. Literary fiction (like 98.5% of poetry these days) is written by and for the entrenched bureaucracy of the creative writing faculty in the universities. There is good fiction, there is bad fiction, and there is fiction written in creative writing workshops.
Perhaps I should quit thinking about my book as potentially literary fiction, as though the label is something to aspire to. It isn’t.
Copyright secured by Digiprove © 2011 James Ament
Essays, Journals, Book Reviews, Commentary on Literature & Culture