The Question of Hell

Several weeks ago, a friend of mine sent me an article called, “Who’s in Hell? Pastor’s Book Sparks Eternal Debate.” I read it, groaned, and thought to myself, “I don’t have a ready answer to this…I’ll get to it later.” The article is in reference to a book by Rob Bell, Love Wins: A Book About Heaven, Hell, and the Fate of Every Person Who Ever LIved, which I haven’t read.

You see, I do not believe in the literal biblical descriptions of hell, for example, as a place “where their worm dieth not and the fire is not quenched.” I see such descriptions as symbols of a spiritual death. Nor do I think as I’ve heard (within the last five years) three “progressive” Methodist ministers state, in one form or another: “it doesn’t matter what you do because God is love.” In other words, universal forgiveness overrides any notion of a God of justice—so Hitler and Mother Teresa are now friends. (Talk about groaning!)

A recent New York Times article by Ross Douthat, A Case for Hell, suggests that:

Doing away with hell, then, is a natural way for pastors and theologians to make their God seem more humane. The problem is that this move also threatens to make human life less fully human.

Atheists have license to scoff at damnation, but to believe in God and not in hell is ultimately to disbelieve in the reality of human choices. If there’s no possibility of saying no to paradise then none of our no’s have any real meaning either. They’re like home runs or strikeouts in a children’s game where nobody’s keeping score.

In this sense, a doctrine of universal salvation turns out to be as deterministic as the more strident forms of scientific materialism. Instead of making us prisoners of our glands and genes, it makes us prisoners of God himself. We can check out any time we want, but we can never really leave.

Or, as C. S. Lewis said,

“There are only two kinds of people in the end: those who say to God, ‘Thy will be done,’ and those to whom God says, in the end, ‘Thy will be done.’  All that are in Hell, choose it.  Without that self-choice there could be no Hell.”  (The Great Divorce)

Continue reading The Question of Hell

Digiprove sealCopyright secured by Digiprove © 2011 James Ament

Bishop Yvette Flunder Says, “I Don’t Know”

The linked video of Bishop Flunder’s sermonette is pointed, and often quite humorous. She, and this video, are not without controversy. But it’s not the purpose of this post to focus on the possibility of a flawed theology—I thought her technique was skilled and she was funny, which is a good way to sell something, including religion. Watch her for the full effect and, if you’re inclined, see if you can think of a reasonable criticism.

As YouTube videos have a way of disappearing, I have added the transcript below:

Continue reading Bishop Yvette Flunder Says, “I Don’t Know”

Book Review—The Problem of Pain

The Problem of Pain, by C. S. Lewis (1898-1963) published 1940

Lewis wanted to write this book anonymously because he felt he was too much an amateur and a layman to cover such a theologically difficult subject. He was convinced otherwise, which was a good thing. We can thus put it into context with his other works as well as the man himself, certainly no “amateur.” I read this once, noticing its rich complexity, so I immediately read it again and wrote what I thought were the highlights, chapter by chapter. Unfortunately, it’s lengthy.

Continue reading Book Review—The Problem of Pain