When I finished Margaret Atwood’s, The Handmaid’s Tale (1986), yesterday morning, I had this thought: “Okay. This is about a despotic Christian theocracy that’s taken over the country. She never uses “right wing” but most readers, I think, would conclude that…as though right and left were on a line with varying degrees of rightness and leftness spreading across the line toward the extremes. But it’s not like that. It’s more like a circle with the patriarchal right on the right, the matriarchal left on the left, anarchy at the top, and totalitarianism at the bottom. When the right and left move up or down—mostly down—to the polar ends, they end up at the same place. Their self-justifications—their intentions—hardly matter. Or better: An idea from Adam Michnik, the Polish dissident, found in Letters to a Young Contrarian (2001) by Christopher Hitchens—an idea that the anti-theist journalist Hitchens said changed his life—that it isn’t about left vs. right…that the real difference is between those that do, and those that do not, think that the citizen is, or should be, the property of the state. Hitchens, that brilliant Trotskyite now dying of cancer, said it had an echo of Thomas Paine’s attack on slavery—“Man has no property in man.” Atwood’s book is full of how the state treats people as “property.” It’s a metaphor for the whole Michnik concept.
I loved the book—I couldn’t put it down.
Continue reading →